Managing Devices

I'm using a lot of devices in the classroom and I've developed a few tips and tricks for managing them.  Probably the biggest thing that I've discovered is that students really do want to be able to use these devices for learning.  They're genuinely interested in showing you, the teacher, that they can indeed be "trusted" with this device.

It certainly makes it easier, but there are still some management (or, more aptly, digital citizenship) techniques I employ.

To begin, we talk about appropriate use - what does it mean to use this device appropriately?  I point out that appropriate use depends on the situation; using a phone with friends is more appropriate than using it when a teacher or fellow student is talking.

We also discuss why they might use it - I think we give students too much credit for knowing how to integrate these into the classroom.

It's usually a good conversation that takes about 20 minutes.

After that, I try and build in places for students to use devices - I'll say "take a picture of 2 right angled triangles" or "record a video of the lab".  This models some good use of the devices.  Throughout I ensure that the students are indeed using them for the correct task.

Inevitably, someone doesn't use it appropriately.  If it's a first or second time, we'll have a chat - what they were doing, when they should have been doing that, etc.  Nothing is set in stone - yes, you can text your mother if it's really important - I use my phone in staff meetings to send important messages as well.  No, you can't play dots in class instead of working, you don't get that privilege yet.

After a couple warnings, they'll lose the device for the day - this is simply because I'm pretty confident they wont NEED these devices later.  When everyone else is using them as well, I'll have to figure something else out!

In terms of laptops, my general rule of thumb is that if more than one student is interested in a screen, I should probably pop over and see what's up.  It's general, and stereotypical, but 9 times out of 10 I have to redirect something.

Another good tip is to remember what they're supposed to be doing with a device.  If everyone is supposed to be writing a paragraph to respond to a science journal prompt, the use of a mouse should be few and far between - anything more than a few clicks and we may have an issue.

Finally, we all need a mental health break.  Depending on the student, I'll give them 5 minutes of Facebook time, or Dots, or whatever - I myself lose my head after about 3 report cards and need to take a brain break!

I'm pleased with the results - students are learning how to use the devices appropriately, which should hopefully carry over into other classrooms and their everyday lives.

Photo Credit: DanielZanetti (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

The Challenge With Group Work

Ahhh group work - the bane of my existence, yet I can't seem to stop using it.

I see the advantages of group work as follows:

1.  Tasks can be larger.  Students are able to be given something that would be challenging for them to complete on their own but very possible with help.

2.  Tasks can be more complex.  Students are able to collaborate and share ideas, thus allowing a stronger student to "carry" a weaker one (more on that in a sec...)

3.  It models what we all do.  It's rare that I work on a project on my own anymore.  I think it's rare that anyone really works on a project on their own - the world is too complex to have to focus entirely on your own work.

The issue arises in that all students are expected to demonstrate everything, which in a science class, means they have only a short period of time on a specific topic.  I only spend so long the human body and I need to ensure that everyone has a deep understanding of all the various pieces.

Thus, group work becomes challenging because attempting to structure it so that everyone understands everything is completely contrary to why we get into a group in the first place!

As an engineer, I know the value of group work.  What schools don't consider, however, is that that in the "real world" (used loosely) groups are formed of DIFFERENT types of people who bring DIFFERENT skills to the table.  So, while I may be the computer and technology expert, I have no earthly idea how to make the final product look decent in a display, hence my excellent artistic colleague.

Furthermore, it's expected that some people will do more than others in their assigned area, or even in general.  There is always a point person and they will very much be doing more than the others in terms of actual work or organization.  In a classroom setting, that causes....problems.  Students expect that every group member will contribute the same amount, and furthermore, that they can completely abdicate responsibility for their group members work.

It therefore makes it not only challenging to complete group work, but to assess it.  How do I honestly say that one person understood less simply because their group member didn't complete the work to a high standard?  But if that's the case, I didn't make an authentic group project!

While I use group work because I think it's important that students work together to solve a problem, I still question how to make it "fair" for all (or teach them what fair really means), assess the various learning outcomes, and keep everyone sane!


Photo Credit to Budzlife - http://www.flickr.com/photos/budslife/1771179517/lightbox/

1:1 Physics - The Power of Google

The 1:1 experiment is testing my abilities to come up with good, useful questions.  It's also allowing me to make some fantastic connections to everything...

The students have gotten into the habit of using the computers to answer the "quick" questions I'd usually throw out - "Who can remember the acceleration due to gravity" or "Do the conversion between kilometers and decameters".  The danger of course is that these are things they will have to know on a test, so while the computers have certainly made the class go faster, I have warned them about the possibilities of them not actually learning this material.

The larger picture, as I keep coming back to, is - do I care that they "learn" the conversion?  Yes, if you read back in posts, I really do care - I think that knowledge is important and memorizing, working with and regurgitating information has it's place in education.  Thus, while the computers have helped, we'll see what ends up happening.

On another Google note - I'm loving the ability to have them turn in their assignments without email.  Having it just appear in my Google Drive is excellent and really saves me having to wade through masses of email.

Socrative

I've fallen in love with Socrative.  It's a great tool, especially in a 1:1 environment.  Essentially, it replaces the clickers that schools used to (still?) spend a ton of money on.

I create my class - and I can name my room anything I like (go to Profile->Change Room Number and you can type words too).  It's great, my students know how to find me, and no login is required.

Students log into my room and I can fire questions anytime I like - I tend to make them up as I go, or I build them into my slides.  It's very quick - press a button, they get a multiple choice or true/false prompt, and off we go.

It's not supposed to be for summative assessment - I can make strong arguments against multiple choice (or tests in general) as an assessment tool.  What it is excellent for is the ability to quickly assess where my learners are - "did they get it?".

"The crest of the wave is a), b), c), d)".  Bam - 20 seconds and I know if they understood the diagram I just put up :)

The challenge comes in deciding what number is okay to move on - in my class of 11 Physics students, for example, anything less than 9 right and I'll go back.  But what about those two who didn't get it, and I moved on?  I struggle with how to best support them - I try and go back after the lecture portion, during an activity or homework time, but don't always remember the exact issues they had.

Thus, while I love the tool, I'm going to have to figure out how to not leave anyone behind.

1:1 Physics - Note Taking with Google Docs

It's been a week and I'm pretty happy thus far with the 1:1 iMacs in class.  If I had to guess, I would suggest they get used 35-45% of a class, which I'm okay with.

The first use for these machines over the week, and in the future, has been taking notes using Google Docs.  I like that I can create a "fill in the blanks" style spreadsheet and have the students create their own copy to add to.

Now, before everyone on the internet tells me that this isn't the way to teach and I'm not using technology effectively - I agree.  I agree, I'd like to do this all very differently,  however, because of my location and the external factors I mentioned, that's not going to be possible this year.  Therefore, I'll be using the machines to the best of my ability within the confines of my requirements.

A couple of students have discovered that after the "formal" notes, when we're working on problems or having a more free-wheeling discussion, they can continue to use Google Docs to share their thoughts with each other.  It's working pretty well - they're strong students, which means they can both contribute to the problem, so I'm fine with it at this point.

Overall - a week in, I'm happy with the uses.  I'll post in a bit about some of the other things we've been doing.

1:1 Physics - An Adventure

I was able to get complete access to my Maclab for my physics 11 class this year.  This is going to be a bit of an adventure in figuring out if a) desktops are going to work like laptops, b) laptops are going to be helpful at all, and c) if I wish I had something else instead!

All the reading I've done says that these computers should be helpful in class.  I promote them to my colleagues in my position as academic tech coordinator, so it's about time to walk-the-walk.

A bit of an overview, and then in subsequent posts I'll  talk about some of the specific uses.

We're going to be using Google Apps for Education to share documents and collaborate amongst ourselves.  I anticipate, in addition to using Google Apps on a regular basis, to be using some various web resources with these computers.

My concern, and we'll see if this manifests, is that because of external requirements such as curriculum, "preparing them for the future", and overal "academic rigor", I wont be able to focus as much as I'd like on these machines.  We'll see!

1:1 Science 8

I'll be using a PC lab as a home base to teach Science 8 this year.  It should be an interesting experience - essentially it will be as if students have laptops, save for the added mobility of an actual laptop.  I'm looking forward to having the ability for students to quickly find information, as well as some transitions between digital and non-digital activities.

A few possible concerns:

1.  How much time will it take to "get started"?  I'll be using a few tools (Google Docs being my home base) and it will be interesting to see if these "digital natives" are able to pick up on the various tools.

2.  How am I going to structure my class to ensure that more than just "fun" happens.  My biggest concern with this whole experiment (and Physics 11, which I'll touch on in another post) is the challenge of providing academic struggle for my students.  It's all well and good that they look at some videos and make some colourful Prezi's or Glogs or whatnot.  It's harder to ensure that there is a level of academic challenge for them.

3.  How badly am I going to kill our network :)  20 students on some of the various websites will be an interesting challenge for our wired network.  It's amazing how much bandwidth these sites will take if you let them - and we don't really have a choice but to let them.  Sadly, unlike some of the better coded pages (YouTube, for example), Glogster, Animoto, etc will all steal as much bandwidth as you have.  I credit this to be because the developers believe they are targeting an audience made up of home users with a single connection, and one or two computers.

Thus, we'll see how it all goes - I'll keep you posted!